Main Menu


Welcome Guest

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length

Search

Author Topic: Body to Frame Mounts - What's the Joke Here?  (Read 732 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Harry Dee

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • member
  • **
  • Posts: 236
  • Exterior Color: Greyish rust explosion
  • Interior color: WWIII
  • Location: Helsinki, Finland
  • VIN #: 187.011.02255/52
  • Year_Model: 1952
Body to Frame Mounts - What's the Joke Here?
« on: June 18, 2011, 06:59:00 PM »
I've noticed that W187 sedan and cabrios have different mounting plates between the frame and the body. But why?

OK, the Cab A body has a wood frame, but the Sedan and Cab B should be quite identical by both frame (excl. extra support welding in the middle) and body floor. So why do they have different height and different material (rubber vs. aluminum) bushings? See attached picture (blue dots) for what I mean.

I can come up with three theories:
a) the height
b) the Cab bodies need to sit stiffer to the frame (for some reason)
c) the frame and body floor is totally different (unlikely, since all measurements and structural parts match).

But why then?

-Harry

EDIT: OK, sorry, one of the blue dots is in the wrong place, but you get the general idea.  ;)
W114 250 C 2.8 - W114 280 C - W187 220
Speed kills but it also makes you very fast!

Offline Henry Magno

  • Trade Count: (0)
  • member
  • ****
  • Posts: 838
  • Location: USA, Massachusetts
  • Year_Model: 1952 220 Cab B, 1937 320 Sedan, 1937 320 Combination Coupe, 1938 320 Cab A LWB
Re: Body to Frame Mounts - What's the Joke Here?
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2011, 08:33:24 PM »
I'm pretty sure that is was to mitigate drumming in the sedan bodies. The Cab B wouldn't drum because of the soft top. As you said, they also may have wanted as much rigidity in the mounts of the convertibles to keep body alignments.